Search for: "May v. Social Security Administration Commissioner" Results 121 - 140 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2020, 11:34 am by Katitza Rodriguez
The BTK can decide to order the Union of Access Providers to comply within four hours or social network providers may face hefty fines of TRY 5 million (more than 500,000 USD). [read post]
The secretary of Health and Human Services has long delegated authority to make the second determination to the FDA commissioner. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Facebook has reportedly informed the Turkish Government that it will not comply with new social media legislation and it may an initial fine of $1.3 million as a result. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am by JP Zanders
However, the ISU is not a formal administrative entity within UNODA or the UN. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The case was remanded with it being held that “Administrative burden is relevant to how and when a judicial record may be unsealed, but not to whether it may be released at all. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of British Gas Trading v McPherson [2020] CSOH 61 was delivered on 13 May 2020. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am by Giles Peaker
The council admitted that from his application to the allocation scheme in May 2018 to acceptance in October 2018 was an administrative delay, with the explanation that it was due to difficulties in obtaining Mr I’s medical records from the NHS. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am by Nicholas Mosvick
On May 24, 1937, the Supreme Court decided in two separate but related cases that the Social Security Act of 1935 was constitutional. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media On 13 May 2020 a formal GDPR complaint [pdf] was filed against Google by noyb.eu for tracking users through “Android Advertising ID” without a valid legal basis. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm by Derek T. Muller
It includes the American Coronavirus/COVID-19 Election Safety and Security Act, or ACCESS Act. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]