Search for: "Meanes v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 68,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
” At a more fundamental level, the dispute in Dawson is about the meaning of McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:57 am
So, the full case against Times v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
Judgment Warby J cited the relevant principles on meaning from paras 11 to 12 of Koutsogiannis v The Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and another intervening); [2012] UKSC 16; [2012] WLR (D) 124 “A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors could be justified as a means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (No 3) [2009] EWCA Civ 97; [2009] WLR (D) 75 “A ‘notice of an amount of the debt’ within the meaning of s4(5) of the Late Payment of Commercial Debt (Interest) Act 1998 did not have to be correct before the court [...] [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:44 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 899; [2010] WLR (D) 206 ”A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors was a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
R (Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 137 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 24 ”When deciding whether to make an award of damages, under art 5(5) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for a breach of art 5(4) of the Convention it was necessary to have regard to the provisions of s 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the restrictions placed on such awards. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
Regina (King) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2522 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 258 “The discretion of a prison governor to decide the extent of an inmate’s basic association with his fellows did not remove from association its quality as a personal right, a right which was subject to the lawful exercise of discretion by the governor. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:03 am
R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 72; [2008] WLR (D) 49 “The court was entitled to decide the meaning of a ministerial policy introducing an ex gratia compensation scheme. [read post]
In a dispute over the meaning of a procedural rule, justices seem settled: “Mistake” means “mistake”
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am
ShareKemp v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
That's the holding of the Court after en banc review in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 2:01 am
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court issued rulings in two separate cases involving the state secrets privilege: United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Blockburger v United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:47 am
The post A Thumbs-Up Emoji Doesn’t Mean That Dad Disavowed His Child–Bardales v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
The post Vacatur and United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:50 pm
The post State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
Angelo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 8:59 am
State v. [read post]
