Search for: "Mendez v. Mendez" Results 121 - 140 of 397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
The attorney for the petitioner in the first case, County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, a Fourth Amendment case stemming from a police search that resulted in a shooting. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, a Fourth Amendment case stemming from a police search that resulted in a shooting. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:55 am by Andrew Hamm
Mendez is here; the transcript in Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, a Fourth Amendment case stemming from a police search that resulted in a shooting. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am by Rory Little
” The Mendezes respond that, in fact, the court has suggested (in a different Fourth Amendment context, Kentucky v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:22 am by NCC Staff
Mendez centers on a legal rule that one federal appeals court has adopted, but others refuse to follow. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, a case that asks whether law enforcement officials can be held liable when they intentionally or recklessly provoke a violent confrontation. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Mendez, in which the court will decide “whether law enforcement officials can be held liable when they needlessly provoke a violent confrontation’; he also reports on a trio of cases, including Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
Mendez, 16-369, involves that court’s exception to the “excessive force standard” the Supreme Court articulated for law-enforcement officers in Graham v. [read post]