Search for: "Michael Gerhardt"
Results 121 - 139
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Michael Gerhardt, a leading scholar on the federal impeachment process, explains that impeachment is a “political process designed to investigate, expose, and remedy political crimes committed by a special class of politicians subject to unique political punishment. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:22 am
One constitutional scholar, Michael J. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H.… [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H.… [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
Thus, as Professor Michael Gerhardt has written, the Privileges or Immunities Clause is the "natural textual home . . . for unenumerated fundamental rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Michael Grynberg, DePaul University College of LawThick Marks Thin MarksMark might be strong but receive weak protection based on nature of claim, such as nominative fair use. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:15 pm
Professor Michael Gerhardt has written an article in 2000 called "The Federal Appointments Process," and I think he has given some advice to our Democratic friends in the past and, maybe recently, about the confirmation process that we're engaged in today. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 5:28 am
Here are the ten developments that I cited as justifying an impeachment inquiry (a view with which my fellow witness University of North Carolina Professor Michael Gerhardt disagreed): The record currently contains witness and written evidence that the President (1) has lied about key facts in these foreign dealings, (2) was the focus of a multimillion-dollar influence peddling scheme, and (3) may have benefitted from this corruption through millions of dollars sent to his family… [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Constitutional Arrogance Tuesday, January 26, 2016 | Eric Schlabs Speaking during the opening session of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review’s 2015 Symposium, Professor Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina Law School and the National Constitution Center argued that the presidency, as an institution, is “peculiarly designed” to stretch the boundaries of its power. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:55 am
The other two, Standord’s Pam Karlan and UNC’s Michael Gerhardt agreed. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Tony Mauro of the BLT reports that Professors Michael Gerhardt (the University of North Carolina) and Orin Kerr (George Washington University) will advise members of the Senate Judiciary Committee in preparing for confirmation hearings. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
As Michael Gerhardt, a law professor who is an expert on the nomination process, explained for this blog earlier this month, Democrats could deploy a variety of tactics to try to slow down or even block Gorsuch’s nomination. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
"He was known mostly as being idiosyncratic for many years," said University of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhardt, a student of the court. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm
"He was known mostly as being idiosyncratic for many years," said University of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhardt, a student of the court. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:48 am
It is a cliche that it is often easier to slay messengers whose messages we find repugnant than to address who is sending the messages in the first place. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Introduction It used to be the case that an endless investigation of the difference between holding and dictum was a central preoccupation of the first year of law school. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Introduction It used to be the case that an endless investigation of the difference between holding and dictum was a central preoccupation of the first year of law school. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Michael Grynberg’s general thesis about TM law: TM law ignores nonconfused consumers, the other 95%, and we should focus on their goals. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
Bradley, Historical Gloss and Foreign Affairs: Constitutional Authority in Practice (Harvard University Press, 2024).Michael J. [read post]
