Search for: "Michael Ginsburg"
Results 121 - 140
of 775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed in the New York Times, Michael McConnell argues that the court’s three recent decisions on religious freedom (Espinoza v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:52 pm
Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg dissented. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
McGarity, Michael C. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Roberts Court Slowly Inters Justice Kennedy's Ephemeral "Jurisprudence of Doubt"
30 Jun 2020, 4:01 pm
I want to clarify, first, one thing from your colloquy with Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
At the Appellate Advocacy Blog, Michael Gentithes suggests that the textualist approach applied by Justice Neil Gorsuch in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Justices Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined Gorsuch in the majority, while Justices Alito and Kavanaugh each wrote dissenting opinions. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
Michael T. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:23 am
Tom Ginsburg lays out the legal issues in an interview in German. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” Additional commentary comes from Erica Goldberg at In a Crowded Theater and Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:43 am
Ginsburg told U.S. [read post]
6 May 2020, 10:31 am
Justice Ginsburg's first question for Noel Francisco involved a lengthy recitation of the law of political accommodations, followed by a "what do you think" quasi-question. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
At the Cato Institute’s Cato on Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Michael Collins urge the court to review Higginson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Joining Justice Gorsuch in the majority were Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kavanaugh, although Justice Thomas did not join any of Justice Gorsuch’s opinion and Justices Sotomayor and Kavanaugh each joined only in part. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
My conversations with Robert Blanchon and Alexis Smith, not to mention Michael Asher, Alan Sekula, Charles Gaines, and Tom Lawson, I recall to this day. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 12:39 pm
Contents include:Article Jay Butler, The Corporate Keepers of International LawTom Ginsburg, Authoritarian International Law? [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm
Michael Kent Curtis, but I thought I needed to repeat it here as well. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
As an initial matter, it does not appear that Wisconsin law even contained a postmark-by requirement, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the dissenters and as Professor Martin Lederman explained at greater length in a blog post. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
" Michael Sandel, who established his reputation as a critic of John Rawls, has been articulating his own theory of the "common good" for quite a while, though I'm not aware that it's really made much headway (and I find it more than a bit problematic myself). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
" Michael Kent Curtis, one of the leading historians of American free speech, was teaching the case in his constitutional law class, and, unsurprisingly, quoted portions from it that included the word "nigger. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court building is now closed to the public and oral arguments have been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but much of the work of the high court goes on. [read post]
