Search for: "Michael Risch"
Results 121 - 140
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 9:45 am
" It would be interesting to hear what PTO examiners think about this.Since this is the last of the symposium papers, here are links to my summaries of the other five papers for those who haven't been following along:Mark Lemley, Michael Risch, Ted Sichelman & Polk Wagner, Life After BilskiPeter Menell, Forty Years of Wondering in the Wilderness and No Closer to the Promised Land: Bilski's Superficial Textualism and the Missed Opportunity To Ground Patent Law… [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:46 pm
For another call to join the Reader bandwagon, see this post at the Conglomerate; for a skeptic's view, consider Michael Risch's post from this blog. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
Michael R. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:09 am
Michael Risch said poor examination led to bad patents, but the problem will subside; we just need to tweak the current rules. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 2:28 pm
[Read the PDF Letter] = = = = = [1] Colleen Chien and Michael Risch, A Patent Reform We Can All Agree On, Wash. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:46 pm
"This is an area of law where it's impossible to get predictable clarity on what is patentable," says Michael Risch, a law professor at Villanova University. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
 Michael Risch, who served as counsel on an amicus brief in favor of neither party in Bilski, has five observations from the Bilski oral argument on PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Michael Risch, A Surprisingly Useful Requirement, 19 Geo. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
Michael Risch, Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am
In the "Other Authorities" section you can find writings by Professors Thomas Cotter (author of the Comparative Patent Remedies blog, which I have recommended previously), Mark Lemley, Mark McKenna & Katherine Strandburg, Michael Risch, and Ryan Vacca. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am
In crafting federal common law under the DTSA, federal courts could look to various sources, from the text and legislative histories of the UTSA, to the Restatement (First) of Torts, to the case law of different states.As Michael Risch pointed out at the panel, another source of law courts could use, both in interpreting the DTSA and in crafting federal common law, are criminal cases decided under the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:07 pm
My co-blogger Michael Risch has already posted his initial reactions to the opinion on Monday, and he also wrote about deference mistakes in the context of the "broadest reasonable interpretation" standard in an earlier article, The Failure of Public Notice in Patent Prosecution.The Federal Circuit's patent law losing streak was broken Monday with the Supreme Court's decision in Cuozzo v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:46 pm
Written Description has grown to include guest posts and other blog authors—currently Camilla Hrdy (since 2013) and Michael Risch (since 2015).Most of my posts have featured scholarship related to IP and innovation. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:23 pm
Other researchers involved are Michael McManus, Joe Costello, Susan Fisher, Neil Risch and Arnold Kriegstein, all of UCSF; Lin He and Dan Rokhsar, both of UC Berkeley, and Amander Clark of UCLA. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
Court limited deference http://t.co/sPxsGwnknL— Michael Risch (@ProfRisch) January 20, 2015 Teva likely not to change very much unless district courts start holding evidentiary hearings just to insulate themselves from review. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:13 pm
:Michael Martin states that Prof. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
” Commentary also comes from Michael Risch in Written Description, who remarks that “this is an area that is not going to be getting clarity any time soon. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:50 am
It can be dangerous to be in a profession where we have a weekly pulpit to discuss our views on issues (with little opposition), where we are often called “experts” on a wide-variety of topics, where we are surrounded by flattery from students and colleagues (with a notable exception discussed in Mike Madison, Michael Risch, and Jeff Lipshaw’s posts on “tough love” at faculty workshops), and where we generally get paid to write, think, and speak… [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:13 pm
We also have a number of distinguished veterans: Bill Araiza, Paul Secunda, Michael Risch, Marc DeGirolami, Marc Blitz, and Will Baude. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
Lee, ruling that the Patent Office can apply the “broadest reasonable interpretation” standard in inter partes review, comes from Ronald Mann for this blog, with commentary from Michael Risch at Written Description. [read post]
