Search for: "Michael Stokes Paulsen" Results 121 - 140 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
[more: Michael Stokes Paulsen, Yale Law Journal, 1993] The result before long could be a face-off in which advocates claim the ERA has been duly adopted as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution, while others say it hasn’t. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am by Cormac Early
Franck of the National Review’s Bench Memos blog discusses a recent essay in Public Discourse by Michael Stokes Paulsen, explaining that the essay has persuaded him that the Chief Justice’s opinion in the health care cases was correct. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:48 pm by Will Baude
Your paper with Michael Stokes Paulsen played a critical role in the Section 3 debates. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Michael Stokes Paulsen (who sometimes contributes to Balkinization) is cited as arguing, I believe correctly, that any Convention would have plenary authority to propose whatever it wished, including the parade of horribles. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
Indeed, the scholarship of conservatives such as McConnell, Calabresi, Michael Stokes Paulsen, and Judge John T. [read post]
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Stuart Buck
A few developments in that case:First, a group of distinguished law professors, including Lillian BeVier (UVA), Rick Garnett (ND), Michael Stokes Paulsen (St. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am by Lawrence Solum
Vasan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Interpretive Force of the Constitution? [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 3:40 pm by Anthony Gaughan
” Vasan Kesavan and Michael Stokes Paulsen addressed the “amazingly complicated question of whether West Virginia is lawfully a State of the United States. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:47 am
Heaney compares my critique of originalism to similar arguments by Michael Stokes Paulsen against nonoriginalism. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
See, e.g., Michael Stokes Paulsen, Scouts, Families, and Schools, 85 Minn. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
See, e.g., Michael Stokes Paulsen, Scouts, Families, and Schools, 85 Minn. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
 One such honorable conservative is Michael Stokes Paulsen, who has a valuable analysis of the electoral college and the constitutionally-guaranteed autonomy of electors. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by JB
., William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Sweep and Force of Section Three 172 U Pa. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:45 am
(Other reviewers, most notably Michael Stokes Paulsen, have raised concerns about the ethical propriety of such a book. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:33 am by Scott Bomboy
Amar also points to arguments made by scholars such as Michael Stokes Paulsen that a proper original textual reading of Article IV, Section 3, indicates that the clause's second semi-colon presents “the distinct possibility- … that Article IV, Section 3 therefore prohibits the creation of new States exclusively from within the boundaries of existing ones. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:34 pm by Sandy Levinson
If that is the decision, will he do by becoming, almost uniquely, a Type I "constitutional defier" (violating the Constitution in order to save the American order, which Michael Stokes Paulsen argued, incidentally, was a power given by the Oath of Office, which is how he defended Abraham Lincoln and, more recently, George W. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:17 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2003, scholars Vasan Kesavan and Michael Stokes Paulsen called the constitutionality of West Virginia “amazingly complicated. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, as Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have documented in a widely cited forthcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, there are other oddities of Griffin’s Case that make it a particularly poor authority on the meaning of Section 3.Trump’s team will lodge other objections. [read post]