Search for: "Miller v. Bare" Results 121 - 140 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm by Stephen Wermiel
Evan Miller, the petitioner in one of the cases granted on Monday, Miller v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:36 am by Robert Wagner
by: Robert Wagner, intellectual property attorney at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Beyond demonstrating how to ensure bare validity, the book goes further to illustrate techniques for achieving desired coverage through rules teaching breadth in drafting, claiming, and prosecuting [Breadth is not for the faint-hearted -- woe to the applicant whose claims run wider than his invention!] [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
App. 1978), aff’d, 402 N.E.2d 194 (Ill. 1980) (not recognized in Illinois); Miller v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Barely mentioned in the article: there is a zero percent chance of collecting any of this. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:11 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Barely mentioned in the article: there is a zero percent chance of collecting any of this. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
He had barely begun on that theme when Justice Samuel A. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:14 am by John Day
S. 178, 189 (1936); see also 13E Wright & Miller §3602.1, at 119. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:23 pm by SOIssues
Circuit Court of Appeals would even need to hear oral arguments in the case of Miller, et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:25 am
Miller, 821 F.2d 546, 548 & n. 2 (11th Cir.1987)), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1056 (1993). [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm by Daniel Brown
August 14, 2009The silent treatmentBy Joe FriesenFrom Saturday's Globe and MailMackel Peterkin was no gangster. [read post]