Search for: "Miller v. Employment Division" Results 121 - 140 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm by Bridget Crawford
CFP: ClassCrits V November 16-17, 2012 CALL FOR PAPERS & PARTICIPATION ClassCrits V  From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream  Sponsored by University of Wisconsin Law School & The Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin Law School  Madison, WI. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Miller v City of New York, 2011 NY Slip Op 08495, Appellate Division, First Department In cases where the conduct complained encompasses a New York City Department of Education’s employee’s scope of his or her public employment, a notice of... [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:08 am by Lawrence Solum
Taking on the slogan “we are the 99%,” the protest movement has launched a national dialogue about income, wealth and structural inequality, race, gender and class divisions in society, and, fundamentally, what it will take to reclaim our vision of a good life. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am by Susan Brenner
Miller, Mens Rea Quagmire: The Conscience or Consciousness of the Criminal Law? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  The latest concerns allegations apparently made in an employment tribunal claim by a former “Mirror” journalist. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Phelps, (Cardozo Law Review de Novo, pp. 35-42, 2011).Richard Schragger, The Politics of Free Exercise After Employment Division v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
”Noting that paragraph 9 of the PBA’s petition seeking to compel arbitration itself confirm that the parties understood that the DEP would be a probationary period, the Appellate Division said that “This clear meaning and understanding of the parties is in complete harmony with the meaning and use of DEPs in similar reported cases,” citing Matter of Miller v Coughlin, 59 NY2d 490, 493; and Matter of McGough v State of New York, 243 AD2d… [read post]