Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2023, 6:19 am
The case is Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
In the 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
in Illinois v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:59 pm
There are no disadvantages to being black or any other minority such that a student's race should not be considered by colleges. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:05 am
Based on precedent set by cases like Kelly v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
From the majority opinion in the new case, Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:03 am
When the Court affirmed this in the 5-4 decision of Grutter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
” Cummings v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
The goal of the process, according to Harvard’s director of admissions, is ensuring there is no “dramatic drop-off” in minority admissions from the prior class. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
The goal of the process, according to Harvard’s director of admissions, is ensuring there is no “dramatic drop-off” in minority admissions from the prior class. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am
Further, chevrons or V-shaped marks can be presented in multiple ways showing different characteristics, e.g. , , , . [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
In Washington v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The seminal decision, Petruis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
” Lulay v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
