Search for: "Moore v. District of Columbia" Results 121 - 140 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Jan. 12, 1987), federal district courts held that the rule precluded pharmacist liability. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:13 pm by Jon Sham
Williams challenged his conviction based on District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In Habib v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2010] NSWDC 244 the NSW District Court dismissed an application to strike out a number of defamatory imputations. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:38 pm
Republican Nat'l Comm., 759 A.2d 682, 695 (D.C.2000) (quoting Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. 16-1 (1998 ed.)); see also United Mine Workers of Am., Int'l v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:38 pm
Republican Nat'l Comm., 759 A.2d 682, 695 (D.C.2000) (quoting Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. 16-1 (1998 ed.)); see also United Mine Workers of Am., Int'l v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  Applying Jackson, a federal district court concluded that “Arkansas has not adopted alternative or market share liability,” in Fields v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:31 pm by Seth Borden
A federal judge in the District of Columbia has granted judgment in favor of the National Mediation Board, allowing a rule change in the way union representation elections are decided  to proceed effective July 1, 2010. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am by INFORRM
  Martin Moore suggests that the Mail is suffering “another public backlash”. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
Although 37 states and the District of Columbia permit juvenile life-without-parole sentences, he wrote that in practice the sentence is highly disfavored. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Judges D. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]