Search for: "Moran v. Moran" Results 121 - 140 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2008, 8:01 am
Moran, 482 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) In introducing electronic evidence, such as the contents of records from a computer, any statements remain subject to the hearsay rules. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:11 pm
When Justice Aronson wrote this opinion for the Court of Appeal over two years ago, I promptly posted that this decision "puts a fair amount of bite" back into the 'vexatious litigant' provisions of CCP 391.3 by allowing the judge to weigh the evidence when deciding whether to require the plaintiff to post security, and argued that the California Supreme Court should grant review to resolve the split in the Court of Appeal and decide whether Justice Aronson was right.It did. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:25 am by admin
Matter of Moran v Cortez 2011 NY Slip Op 05072 Decided on June 7, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department After a hearing, the family court awarded custody of the child to father. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 2:39 pm
  And I will continue posting about a few of Judge Moran's opinions from the case, in addition to his opinions regarding the post-trial motions that I am sure will be filed. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:12 pm
Nearly Legal has written an interesting post today regarding the Court of Appeal judgment in Manchester City Council v Moran & Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378, a decision that could have very serious consequences for women's refuges.The two appeals, heard together, concerned two women who were occupying women's refuges and who both sought rehousing by the local authority after deliberately acting so as to cause themselves to be… [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 10:16 am
  Judge Moran will hear the inequitable conduct case beginning next week. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:01 am
  And Judge Moran recently heard argument on, but did not decide, eSpeed's motion for an evidentiary hearing on inequitable conduct. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm by Dave
In Hashi v Birmingham CC, reported in this month's Legal Action, James Stark, to whom we are grateful for the transcript, has succeeded before HHJ Oliver Jones QC in the Birmingham County Court, in arguing that Birmingham failed to take account of the significance of an HHSRS assessment in the context of the definition of homelessness. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm by Dave
In Hashi v Birmingham CC, reported in this month's Legal Action, James Stark, to whom we are grateful for the transcript, has succeeded before HHJ Oliver Jones QC in the Birmingham County Court, in arguing that Birmingham failed to take account of the significance of an HHSRS assessment in the context of the definition of homelessness. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380 (17 April 2008) Manchester City Council v Moran & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 378 (17 April 2008) TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd & Ors v Lanwall Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 382 (17 April 2008) Duffield & Anor v Gandy [2008] EWCA Civ 379 (17 April 2008) Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374 (16 April 2008) A v Essex County Council [2008]… [read post]