Search for: "Movant's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause"
Results 121 - 140
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
D.M.T., Appellee. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Intervention -- Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to reconsider order of dismissal because of pending late-filed motion to intervene -- Intervention may not be allowed after final judgment save in the interests of justiceLESLIE K. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
It held that Family Court properly took judicial notice of the order of filiation entered on consent. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
" Nella then showed me her new [w]ill and I noticed that she had written on it. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
OPINION AND ORDER SARGUS, J. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Summary judgment is appropriate where `the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
Appeals -- Preservation of issue -- Appeal alleging that circuit court had no procedural basis to enter final order -- Where nothing in plaintiff's appendix suggests he raised his procedural argument to the circuit court, and plaintiff has not provided a transcript of the hearing which led to the final order, the appellate court is forced to conclude that the plaintiff has not preserved his procedural argument -- Based on circuit… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:18 pm
Once movant has made the requisite showing, the burden shifts to the nonmoving party to produce evidentiary proof, in admissible form, sufficient to establish the existence of a triable issue of material fact. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But the government waived its right to file a responsive brief, so unless [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Does 1-9 (Denver, CO)Ex Parte Order dated April 4, 2007 (Granting Ex Parte Order, But Declining to Rule that Court Order is Unnecessary)*Arista v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Finally, Transocean presented evidence that the success of its invention caused others to copy it, including Maersk USA. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
In response, defendant Officer Martin drove to the scene. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
For these (mostly Western oriented) civil society actors the answer was clear, though appalling from the perspective of history—a mandatory extraterritoriality imposed on powerful states to act as global agents through their national courts to discipline multinationals operating anywhere.[9] More interesting still, these civil society elements sought to use their critique to advance another agenda—the inversion of traditional international law, positing a character of… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
The court presumably will direct the government to file a response before it grants relief to petitioner Jonathon Lamb. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Starting with the general rules in Texas, a creditor must sue for payment of debt "not later than four years after the day the cause of action accrues. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
__X__ The trial court’s judgment. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
After a close look at each of these putative justifications, the Court concludes that the CTA is not authorized by the Constitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
In a separate order, the court adjudged defendant to be in contempt of the pendente lite order, but imposed no punishment. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Legal Standard for a Motion for Summary Judgment Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings and evidence show “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
