Search for: "Mr. Arnold"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagreed on the inventiveness of expandable hoses. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
However, both Arnold LJ and Floyd LJ were in agreement that the commercial success of Mr Berardi's invention could not be relied on to demonstrate inventiveness. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
Nevertheless, both judges were sympathetic to the inventor, Mr Berardi. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
The rules came into force in 2010 at the same time that Mr Justice Birss (as he now is) was appointed to the Patents County Court (PCC). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:32 pm
Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Floyd, Males and Arnold) Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics UK Ltd (t/a Mylan) and another [2020] EWCA Civ 793 (24 June 2020) This was an appeal by the claimants, Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd ("Neurim") and its exclusive licensee Flynn Pharma Ltd ("Flynn"), against Mr Justice Marcus Smith's refusal in Neurim [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
The defamation suit against Twitter Bitcoin analyst Hodlonaut was filed by Mr Wright after the former called him a “fraud. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
Arnold J of the UK Patents Court to conclude in [2018] EWHC 2416 (Pat) that one part of the two-pronged test established by the CJEU in Teva v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:24 am
Decision number three by Mr/Lord Justice Arnold in the High Court [2020] EWHC 990 (Ch), this time to apply the law (as clarified by the CJEU's January 2020 judgment - KatPosts here, here and here) to the facts (as found by the judge at first instance - KatPost here; not forgetting a clarification of the terms of reference to the CJEU here and a failed application for permission to appeal in relation to this). [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 11:09 am
Mr. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:50 am
Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold and Lady Justice Nichola Davies) Genentech Inc v Comptroller and Master Data Center v Comptroller [2020] EWCA Civ 475 (31 March 2020) These were appeals from the decision of Mr Recorder Campbell QC in Master Data Center, Inc v Comptroller [2020] EWHC 572 (Pat) (11 March 2020) which I blogged in Supplementary Protection [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
[117] Mr Arnold said that was wrong—the statute was aimed at exploitation of designs. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm
[117] Mr Arnold said that was wrong—the statute was aimed at exploitation of designs. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
The claimant said that Mr Wightman harmed its plans to raise funds for a wildcat sanctuary in the Highlands. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
Lord Justice Arnold commented the presentation by asking how we should strike the balance between innovation and unfair monopolies. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On Thursday 5 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Canada Goose Retail v Persons Unknown [2020} EWCA Civ 303. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
Indeed a judge or recorder hearing a case may not be aware of a pattern of a misguided litigant (such as Mr Lilley of Lilley v DMG Events Ltd [2014] EWHC 610 (IPEC)) incurring unaffordable fees over various cases. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
“Mr. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, D [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
Last year, in a dispute between Lilly and Genentech, Mr Justice Arnold (as then was) in the UK High Court found one of these patents (EP1641822) invalid. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which should be added to… [read post]
