Search for: "Mr. Booker"
Results 121 - 140
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
He said Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
After the guidelines were made nonbinding in Booker, the Supreme Court, and then the courts of appeals, set out a procedure for sentencing in a federal case. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
After the guidelines were made nonbinding in Booker, the Supreme Court, and then the courts of appeals, set out a procedure for sentencing in a federal case. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
Booker, 125 S. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
Booker, 125 S. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:44 pm
Other serious allegations were made against Mr Tune and members of his family. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
Mr. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 9:31 am
Mr. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
It is presumed that Mr Booker was unable to see a missing section of the floor as he walked over it. [read post]
21 May 2011, 3:29 pm
” (UK Human Rights Blog – earlier post on Mr Booker here). [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:39 am
Mr Justice Tugendhat stated that “If people publish material on a social network or other similar places it does not have the effect of rendering the injunction powerless. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:13 am
But, as Reed says … Mr Booker could have attended any of the hearings. [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Because Mr Booker could have attended any of the hearings. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:22 pm
He criticised in particular two articles by Booker, who had not attended any of the hearings: Mr Booker’s articles contain significant factual errors and omissions. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:55 pm
He criticised in particular two articles by Booker, who had not attended any of the hearings: Mr Booker’s articles contain significant factual errors and omissions. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Not surprisingly, Judge Bellamy was critical of what Mr Booker had to say about the case. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
On the other hand, the jury acquitted Mr. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Because Mr. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:10 am
" It would be nice to think that Mr Booker might read this post. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
Richard Lonnie Booker, 2011 Cal. [read post]
