Search for: "Murphy v. Stephens"
Results 121 - 140
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm
But on the other hand, the Justices allowed Erin Murphy to speak (effectively) at length, and it appeared that Murphy sat down early, which can often be a favorable sign. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Murphy for Same-Sex Marriage and LGBT Rights, (Boston University Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 3, 2015).Robin Fretwell Wilson, Bargaining for Religious Accommodations: Same-Sex Marriage and LGBT Rights After Hobby Lobby, (The Rise of Corporate Religious Liberty (Micah Schwartzman, Chad Flanders, Zoë Robinson, eds., Oxford University Press, 2016)).Stephen Matthew Feldman, (Same) Sex, Lies, and Democracy: Tradition, Religion, and Substantive Due Process (With an Emphasis on… [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Mazerbo v Murphy, 52 AD3d 1064, 1066). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Murphy, 191 Wis.2d 517, 523, 530 N.W.2d 1 (Wisconsin Court of Appeals 1995). . . . [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 12:01 am
‘During arguments Jan. 15 in Lambrix v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Dodgers v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
This changed in 1977 with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Bates v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Hidden behind a paywall but nonetheless patronised by the intelligentsia of the United Kingdom lies a Sunday Times feature, "Twitter gags copycats who filch comedians’ lines", by James Gillespie, Stephen Armstrong and John Harlow. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:13 pm
Nursing Home v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
Be Careful What You Wish For, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 15-15 Stephen Schulhofer, SSRN. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Murphy, both of NYU Law School. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
In the matter of Murphy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
Stephen Fincher (R-Tenn.) and Rep. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm
People v Murphy Court Discusses Whether the Sentence Imposed was Excessive in Driving While Intoxicated Offenses The defendant was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2-a) (b), driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am
Judge Karen V. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am
Judge Karen V. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am
Judge Karen V. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:08 am
Round 1: Judicial Dissolution Denied In August 2010, Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
