Search for: "Murray v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., Murray v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
The case is important for its discussion of the practical hurdles faced by the Superior Courts in applications for judicial review seeking an order of prohibition. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
He had a right to an explanation of the reason for rejection of his petition if he filed in superior court, but he chose not to. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
FN5 See e.g., Murray v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
That issue was addressed by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey in a June 3, 2010 case called, Woodbridge Medical Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
Justice Farley, formerly of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, for example, has said [in Nova Growth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
June 16, 2009, Surrick, J.) and Murray v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:25 pm
McD. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:30 pm
Superior Court (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 341, 347; Murray v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
Murray judgment in R. v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 4:57 pm
May, 22, 2009) [Download PDF]Somers v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:55 am
” Bateman, at 651-52 (citing Murray v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
" Murray Franklin Jacks v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
Yesterday's 2-1 Court of Appeals decisions in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
Reporting today on the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 4:42 pm
Murray said he expects to ask the state Supreme Court to review the decision. [read post]
