Search for: "N.B. v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
(Hint: The answer ain’t stacked misdemeanors).United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:46 am
* N.B. 4 NYCRR 5.3(b) applies with respect to employees of the State of New York as the employer. 4 NYCRR 1, Application of Rules, states that “Except as otherwise specified in any particular rule, these rules shall apply to positions and employments in the classified service of the State and public authorities, public benefit corporations and other agencies for which the Civil Service Law is administered by the State Department of Civil… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
Last month (in State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:28 am
”N.B. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
Dissent: In Bluman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm
(N.B. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 3:29 am
N.B. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
[N.B. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:59 am
(N.B. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
The Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:02 pm
From Judge Andrew Guilford in M.B. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
(N.B. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Patent No. 6,556,488 entitled DELAY LOCKED LOOP FOR USE IN SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE and owned by 658868 N.B. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Patent No. 6,556,488 entitled DELAY LOCKED LOOP FOR USE IN SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE and owned by 658868 N.B. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:51 pm
” State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:21 pm
N.B.: This decision should be closely compared and contrasted with the Delaware Court of Chancery’s opinion styled Charney v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
S. 873 (1975), and United States v. [read post]