Search for: "NAACP v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 1:25 pm by Steve Hall
Cruel and Unusual: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment is Michael Meltsner's gripping account of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund's original campaign to abolish the death penalty, ending with the Supreme Court's 1972 ruling in Furman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:48 am by Greg Robinson
My intention is to explore the subject through the prism of the1942-3 legal case Regan v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:01 am by Dan Ernst
Before being appointed to the Supreme Court by President Lyndon Johnson, Marshall was a lawyer for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Federal Judge (1961-1965), and Solicitor General of the United States (1965-1966). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
Sherrilyn Ifill is the president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., which filed an amicus brief in support of the commission in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm by Steve Hall
  It was written with Christina Swarns of NAACP LDF. [read post]
14 May 2025, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Briefs in the main case: Appellant Brief Red States Amicus Brief Appellee Brief Federal Amicus Brief Lawyers Committee Amicus Brief NAACP Amicus Brief NCAI Amicus Brief Reply No goddam justice in this country anymore. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Her Facebook page on the book is here.OUP explains: Much of the struggle for racial justice in the United States has taken place in the courts, from the Civil Rights Cases of 1883 to Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
The first thing we need to do is make real the words of the NAACP charter and eradicate prejudice, bigotry, and discrimination among citizens of the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
This logic would allow the state to aid Klan members to display a burning cross to harass someone who donates to the NAACP, because the great majority of people now oppose racism. [read post]