Search for: "National Council v. State Council" Results 121 - 140 of 5,145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The decision follows the landmark ruling in R ( KTT) v the Secretary of State for the Home Department, where it was held that confirmed victims with ongoing asylum claims based on re-trafficking risk were eligible to modern slavery leave under the Home Office’s published policy. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
But the Council has become hopelessly dysfunctional. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:55 am by Tomaso Falchetta
The outcome of these negotiations could dictate national cyber policies for years to come. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am by Xandra Kramer
Written by Eduardo Silva de Freitas (Erasmus University Rotterdam), member of the Vici project Affordable Access to Justice, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO), www.euciviljustice.eu. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said, “We’re not looking for a war; we’re not looking to expand this. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Ingo Venzke
Two years ago, in December 2020, the Amsterdam municipal council voted to ban fossil advertising in public transport spaces, with some first effects. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:03 am by Adil Ahmad Haque
On December 8, 2023, all but two members of the UN Security Council voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire, with 13 of 15 States voting in favor and one abstaining, but they were prevented from taking that decisive action by the lone veto of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In the course of the judgment, the CJEU makes it very clear that, as stated in its previous judgment of 12 September 2019, the national court must take into account “all the circumstances of the case”, a caveat that does not appear to be in line with a pure strict liability system, as generally understood in civil law. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Nathan and Parker) rejects these arguments and the law stands.The case is Restaurant Law Center v. [read post]