Search for: "National Indemnity Co. v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Sellers, quoted Mark Behrens, of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, as stating that: “This case is part of an emerging national attack on state workers’ compensation systems by the personal injury bar. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
MGIC Indemnity Corp., 823 F.2d 276, 280-82 (9th Cir. 1986) and Gon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Everest National Insurance Co., the Ninth Circuit rejected the policyholder’s argument that the potential for vicarious liability under Section 12940 was sufficient to shield a judgment from Section 533’s preclusion. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
  As explained in this neat little summary, the Court is on the verge of deciding Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
China National Chartering Company Ltd v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, Gard Marine and Entergy Ltd  v China National Chartering Company Ltd & Anor, and Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, heard 1-3 November 2016. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:00 am by Lucy Liu
Stay informed on M&A developments and subscribe to our blog today. [1] National Trust Co. v Mead et al. [1990] 2 SCR 410 (SCC). [2] Ibid. [3] Canadian Encyclopedic Digest, 4th ed, (Thomson Reuters Canada, 2016) at Title 35, Contracts, XIII 1(d)(i). [4] Rodaro v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
After careful review, we AFFIRM. 08a0049p.06 Watson Wyatt & Co v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOTT, M.D.; from Lubbock County; 7th district (07-06-00075-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-25-08)08-0241 GENERAL STAR INDEMNITY COMPANY v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878), but it’s so old and out of date we’re not going to discuss it further.The current rule, articulated by two ironically named cases, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
National Drug Co., 23 A.2d 743 (Pa. 1942), long before the concept of §402A strict liability in tort was even a gleam in a plaintiff’s lawyer’s eye. [read post]