Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Grant" Results 121 - 140 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 5:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., courts defer to agency interpretations of statutory mandates unless the interpretations are unreasonable. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., courts defer to agency interpretations of statutory mandates unless the interpretations are unreasonable. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The court determines that the plaintiffs “fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked,” per Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:08 pm by Jeff Kern and Christopher Bosch
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), which generally requires that courts defer to an administrative agency’s interpretation of statutes they implement where the statutory language is ambiguous and the agency’s interpretation is reasonable. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 5:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and Auer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 10:02 am by Susan Ross (US)
” Public Resource then raised the affirmative defense of fair use. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am by Whitney Roy
NINTH CIRCUIT ISSUES PRECEDENTIAL OPINION RESTRICTING THE NAVY’S PEACETIME USE OF SONAR Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am by Whitney Roy and Alison Kleaver
NINTH CIRCUIT ISSUES PRECEDENTIAL OPINION RESTRICTING THE NAVY’S PEACETIME USE OF SONAR Natural Resources Defense Counsel, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Enquirer, Inc. (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 991, 1009; see also Frommoethelydo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
–Congress makes the following findings: . . . (3) The processing times in the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s other immigration benefits [cases, i.e., other than naturalization applications] have been unacceptably long. [read post]