Search for: "Navarro, Appeal of"
Results 121 - 140
of 236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2016, 12:59 pm
Navarro’s case is to be heard at the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:59 pm
Navarro’s case is to be heard at the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:59 pm
Navarro’s case is to be heard at the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:59 pm
Navarro’s case is to be heard at the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:35 am
Navarro et al. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 12:29 pm
Xie appealed, still representing himself. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 12:29 pm
Xie appealed, still representing himself. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am
Navarro, describing it as “a unanimous reminder that Chevron is not absolute, refusing to accord deference to a Department of Labor regulation interpreting a narrow question about the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeal – Fourth District: In re M.H., 2016 WL 3541185 (2016). [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:09 pm
Navarro, No. 15-415 (U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:40 am
Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, in Rhea Lana, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:50 am
In the appeal before the D.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:07 am
Navarro didn’t hurt. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
Navarro, decided on June 20. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:41 pm
Navarro et al., holding that the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:41 am
Navarro, 579 U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:52 pm
Navarro), the Court’s analysis oozed with deference. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court sent the case back to the court of appeals, asking it to decide whether the statute requires paying overtime to the service advisors. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
Navarro, in which the underlying case is about whether service advisors in a Mercedes-Benz dealership are entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
