Search for: "Nevers v. United States Department of Justice et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL., Appellees/Cross-Claimants/plaintiffs. 3rd District.Appeals -- Timeliness -- Untimely motion for rehearing did not toll rendition of final order for purposes of appeal -- Appeal dismissedIVORY MILES, JR., Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
How Lefaivre could give precedence to a two-justice concurrence (about already adjudicated violations) over the 7-justice Buckman majority, which recognized no such exception, is also mystifying. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
If MF Global went into what are supposed to legally segregated customer funds, that must be completely separated and never used by MF Global either for its own purposes or that of other customers, then fraud and embezzlement would have occurred. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
For example, in a federal District Court in Lynchburg, Va., the Justice Department in August 2010 filed a brief arguing — among other points — that the Anti-Injunction Act barred that lawsuit. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
New York, et al. (10-1404) and Oneida Indian Nation, et al., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Amicus brief of Columbia Legal Services et al. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:12 am
United States opinion last Thursday: On May 16, 2003, Solorzano Arroyo went into labor. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
Secretary, Department of Corrections, et. al. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
(Ricci et al.. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
" Global-Tech Appliances et al v. [read post]
