Search for: "New v. Tolle" Results 121 - 140 of 2,695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
The revisions added a new introduction, “Foundational Principles of Corporate Prosecution,”[5] which put the focus on individual wrongdoers. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
By that point, the mounting toll of wasted hours and legal fees may well have led you to abandon your claim, or settle it for pennies on the dollar. [read post]
“Certain entities” were found to have engaged in various deceptive acts or practices in connection with the marketing, sale, and servicing of credit card add-on products such as claiming that consumers could cancel the product simply by calling a toll-free number when additional steps were required. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These factual contentions concerning whether defendant continued to represent plaintiff during the relevant time period so as to toll the limitations period give rise to factual issues that cannot be resolved in this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Boesky v Levine, 193 AD3d 403 [1st Dept 2021]; Johnson v Law Off. of Kenneth B. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The justices will decide two questions: (1) Whether the rebuttable presumption of equitable tolling from Irwin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
” In 2019, a new case was filed by Shannon Sacco and her daughter over injuries sustained from “unreasonable scaring. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, the Appellate Division noted the Plaintiff's claim that her initial filing tolled the statute of limitations was unavailing "because the time to commence an Article 78 proceeding is not extended by her eventual pursuit of administrative remedies," citing Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 128 AD3d 584. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, the Appellate Division noted the Plaintiff's claim that her initial filing tolled the statute of limitations was unavailing "because the time to commence an Article 78 proceeding is not extended by her eventual pursuit of administrative remedies," citing Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 128 AD3d 584. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:50 am
Mambrino (Petition for new trial; summary judgment; claim that trial court incorrectly concluded that tolling provision (§ 52-595) pertaining to fraudulent concealment of cause of action did not toll applicable three year statute of limitations (§ 52-582)). [read post]