Search for: "Nicholas v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 1,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 5:28 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) At SCOTUSreport.com, Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz has an excellent post on Chief Justice Roberts’ use of the canon of constitutional avoidance in NFIB v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
"David Hoffman moderates a discussion between Compassion & Choices lawyer Kevin Diaz and physician Nicholas Gideonse who successfully challenged Oregon's residency requirement.Oregon recently amended its residency requirement for patients seeking aid-in-dying in the settlement that decided Gideonse v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
He held (at paragraph 26) that this approach was wrong, thus overruling the decision in GW v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
StateCitation: 2009 WY 12Docket Number: S-08-0105Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Nicholas G. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Secondly, this regulation has received new scrutiny after the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in NYSRPA v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm by LTA-Editor
By Nicholas Ulrich The recent outbreak of measles in some states has caused many to question our present vaccination polices. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:00 am
Update: Here is the full Court of Appeals decision in Kelly v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am by SHG
Michigan Lawprof Nicholas Bagley raises the alarm that, based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Gundy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:43 am by Andrew Hamm
This afternoon the Court granted review in King v. [read post]