Search for: "Nix v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
As Eric mentions, the court questions whether a site that is totally off-shore can be held liable if there's no predicate act that occurs in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am
MOZIE section 2(d) opposition but nixes fraud claim (TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Levi Strauss – Levi Strauss’s trademark and domain name claims may block unauthorized resales: Levi Strauss v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:13 am
State of Oregon v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:04 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Yes, it’s time to roll out Nix v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:09 am
Neff, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Rockwool Limited (Class 46) (IPKat) Copyright confusion (1709 Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation moves to senate floor (Patent Docs) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step) How will the new House members handle patent reform? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
United States of America v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:32 pm
As the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts noted in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Highlights this week included: CAFC nixes 25% ‘rule of thumb’ application for estimating patent damages: Uniloc v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:06 am
Unilever United States, Inc., Civ. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:27 am
On December 8, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
As Wikipedia also notes, in “Nix v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
The Court of Appeal had noted that guilty pleas to the conspiracy charges in the United States and manufacturers’ agreements to pay fines calculated as a function of the gross pecuniary gain they derived from the crime amounted to “admissions that they engaged in the wrongful conduct alleged by the appellant and that they obtained an unlawful benefit from that conduct. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Ltd.. v. [read post]
