Search for: "No Named Respondents"
Results 121 - 140
of 30,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2007, 6:56 pm
Though most people going through a mediation aren't trained as negotiators and don't know those tactics by name, everyone practices these tricks at some point or another. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:37 am
The respondent must “[r]espond specifically to the statements and allegations contained in the complaint and include any and all bases for the Respondent (domain-name holder) to retain registration and use of the disputed domain name. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:06 am
Although the domain name registration was done before the GI application was filed, French media were already covering the plaintiff’s preparations: the respondent surely knew about the reputation of Limoges porcelain and its forthcoming GI registration.DecisionAFNIC sided with the claimant. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:40 am
Coming to know of it, the appellant filed a Civil Suit against the responding claiming that the respondent was passing off its business and services by using the appellants business name and domain name. [read post]
28 May 2021, 5:05 am
DO NOT RESPOND. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am
” Note the proviso that it depends on the use that a respondent makes of the domain name. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
What if the "similar" ones were the ones that named individuals the administration chooses to protect? [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Page’s demand letter seems only to have succeeded in getting his name, and that of his modeling agency, into wider circulation. [read post]
Engaging in Extensive, Widespread Publicity of Website and Service Prior to Domain Name Registration
10 Mar 2011, 3:17 am
Further, there is no reference to ‘True Local’ as being the name of the Respondent’s business. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:00 pm
Arguing that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its service mark, Complainant alleged that Respondent was using a "homonym to capitalize on Complainants' marks". [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:17 am
Respondents contended that they adopted “ets” because it was the natural acronym of their trade name Educational Training Service. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:00 am
The name and condition of the driver of the 18-wheeler were not released. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 8:05 pm
” The post Financial Institutions Directed to Respond to Hearbleed Attacks appeared first on beSpacific. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:39 am
By doing so, Respondent established his rights and legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:16 am
The domain name was acquired by a company that was itself acquired in 2005 by the parent corporation of the current Respondent. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:31 pm
A complaint recently filed by the Illinois Administrator alleges in part On or about September 11, 2018, Respondent purchased the domain name "firetheliarjudge.com" from GoDaddy, and used GoDaddy to create a website for "firetheliarjudge.com". [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:18 am
The Illinois Review Board recommends a two-year suspension of an attorney The Administrator charged Respondent in a two-count second amended complaint with preparing a will that named Respondent's two children as beneficiaries, and with mishandling and dishonestly misappropriating client funds.... [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
" Ultimately, the Panel also found that the Respondent had no legitimate interest with respect to the disputed domain name and the disputed domain name was both registered and being used in bad faith and ordered the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:15 am
A number of panelists have had second thoughts on the construction of the UDRP that allows the respondent to (egregiously) use the domain name in bad faith. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 7:45 am
Complainant appears to have been misleading as to whether it adopted its mark before or after respondent's registration of the domain name CREDITEUROPE.COM, and argues that it is simply more important than registrant. [read post]
