Search for: "O'Connor v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
National Solid Wastes Management Ass’n (1992) 505 U.S. 88, 92 (Gade) (plur. opn. of OConnor, J.).) [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:25 pm by Ilya Somin
City and County of San Francisco, then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote a concurring opinion, joined by three other justices (including Clarence Thomas, Sandra Day O'Connor, and current Supreme Court swing-voter Anthony Kennedy), in which he admitted he had been wrong to vote with the majority in Williamson County, and urged the Court to overrule it in a future case: As the Court recognizes,... [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
"(Tillerson on attacks in Cuba: 'We don't like our diplomats being targeted', The Washington Post (6 Dec 2017)).This serves as a potent double edged attack on the Cuban state. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:25 am by NCC Staff
United States (1992), Justice Sandra Day OConnor found that a federal waste-management law "would ';commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
Now Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the Sixth Circuit has written a concurrence in a decision, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
After reviewing the pleadings and applicable law, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that United States District Judge Reed O'Connor DENY Plaintiff Wilfred Omoloh's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Injunction (ECF No. 11), GRANT Asem Z. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm by Giles Peaker
However, in my view, if she left with reckless disregard of what her housing prospects would be in the United Kingdom, or shutting her eyes to how she would in practice meet the obvious need for accommodation when she came here (as it was put in OConnor at (34), and see F v Birmingham City Council at (17), set out above), that would not have been an act in good faith for the purposes of section 191(2). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:09 am by Symone Mazzotta
In her dissent, Justice Sandra Day OConnor did not challenge the authority Congress has within the Spending Clause. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1992), Justice Sandra Day OConnor found that a federal waste-management law "would ';commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Chuck Cosson
These two points are made clear in both the main opinion by Justice Stevens and in the concurrence by Justice OConnor (which Chief Justice Rehnquist joined). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented, along with John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day OConnor, and Byron White. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
But Chief Justice William Renquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas wrote separate concurrences, stating that requiring teachers to lead the Pledge was constitutional. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Wei Li, Montefiore East Tremont Practice, Off¬Label Medical Device use by Surgeons Public Health Law Session 1E – Room 242Overarching Themes in Public Health LawModerator: Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of LawLance Gable, Wayne State University Law School, Public and Private Models of Public Health Governance in Trump’s AmericaLewis Grossman, American University Washington College of Law, The Taming of Progressive ‘State… [read post]