Search for: "O S V Determination"
Results 121 - 140
of 10,014
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2018, 1:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:50 am
Bd. of Health v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
The court of appeals was correct in determining that foreseeability is irrelevant to the determination of a physician’s duty. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:15 pm
The FDCPA allows a court to award attorney's fees "[o]n a finding by the court that [the] action...was brought in bad faith and for... [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:01 am
Excesso Inicialmente, o Ministério Público estadual de São Paulo havia indiciado o dono do terreno por uma série de crimes elencados na Lei 9.605/1998 (Lei de Crimes Ambientais). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
Excesso Inicialmente, o Ministério Público estadual de São Paulo havia indiciado o dono do terreno por uma série de crimes elencados na Lei 9.605/1998 (Lei de Crimes Ambientais). [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" citing Matter of O'Mahony v DiNapoli, 157 AD3d 1107, As the record reflected that the training exercise program "arose from, and was a required part of, [Petitioner's] routine duties as a firefighter and given that the attendant risks of that training", the Appellate Division found that "substantial evidence supports the determination denying Petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
" citing Matter of O'Mahony v DiNapoli, 157 AD3d 1107, As the record reflected that the training exercise program "arose from, and was a required part of, [Petitioner's] routine duties as a firefighter and given that the attendant risks of that training", the Appellate Division found that "substantial evidence supports the determination denying Petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:38 am
The Circuit today affirmed the defendant’s conviction in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 1:10 pm
Segundo a PGR, o dispositivo legal viola o artigo 37, incisos II e V, da Constituição da República. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:11 am
For example, in the 2004 case of SEC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Justice William O. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:32 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Circuit’s 2010 opinion in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:03 pm
Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of O v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:02 am
By Jason Rantanen Eon-Net LP v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:12 pm
By Jason Rantanen TiVo Inc. v. [read post]