Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 3:11 am by Scott Bomboy
United States that a commercial fisherman who discarded undersized red groupers didn’t violate the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), on Friday, March 30, 2018 Tags: Board oversight, Cash flows, Cybersecurity, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Firm valuation, Leverage, Market reaction, Privacy, Public firms, Risk management, Risk-taking, Shareholder value, Target firms An Early Look at the State of U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am by CFM Admin
Further, the Chairman stated most ICOs to date that he has seen have been offers and sales of securities. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
That said, employees who report misconduct internally may still be entitled to anti-retaliation protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:35 am by Joy Waltemath
But he concurred in the panel’s refusal to reinstate the plaintiff’s defamation claim against the CEO (Genberg v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:54 am by Julia Malleck
In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley law (SOX) was passed in wake of the Enron and Worldcom scandals, and the Senate Judiciary Committee stated in its final legislative report that the Passaic Valley standard protecting any “non-frivolous” report should control in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower case. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Court handed down its decision in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]