Search for: "Oklahoma v Rule"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
(citing Lessee of Pollard v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
See Oklahoma v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am
Oklahoma Congress cannot designate the location of a state capital.) [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm
World Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
In Knick v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 5:48 pm
For example, in Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In the new, post-Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:57 am
For example, in a recent case out of Oklahoma, a judge ruled that a married, non-biological mother has no parental rights to the child she and her wife created and were raising together, but the couple’s sperm donor does. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
Those changes met Court approval in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v Chevron Corp., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 12:01 am
The Court ruled that Oklahoma had violated Sipuel’s constitutional rights, because there was no other institution in the state (i.e., for Blacks) offering a legal education. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 7:34 am
My state, Oklahoma, follows this rule, holding that “the insurer has the burden of showing that a loss falls within an exclusionary clause of the policy…[and,] in case of doubt, exclusions . . . are construed strictly against the insurer. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 7:48 am
See First Interstate Bank of Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Some, as noted above, have even banned the practice at common law, though state courts have increasingly relaxed those rules in favor of regulation.[23] Such laws are already on the books in Arkansas, Maine, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, some of which limit the amount and type of funding entirely.[24] At the Federal level, the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:40 am
As Chief Justice John Roberts put it in last summer’s Carson v. [read post]
