Search for: "Olson v. District Court" Results 121 - 140 of 558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Collateral Consequences as a Consideration in the Right to a Jury Trial Calculation On June 21, 2018 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals sitting en banc rendered a decision inJean-Baptiste Bado v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:22 am by Josh Blackman
In any event, if a district court judge takes this approach, a race to the Supreme Court commences. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
The dust continues to settle from the court’s unanimous rulings on Monday in two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm by George Conway
Olson, the high court approvingly noted how “Congress itself has vested the power to make [U.S. attorney] interim appointments in the district courts” under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In a related context, as the Supreme Court recognized in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the court heard oral argument in Abbott v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
A case in point are the attacks during the investigation of President Bill Clinton on the Special Division of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, accused of partisan mischief replacing of Robert Fiske with Ken Starr. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
So all Adam’s proposal really adds here is that the three-judge district court would have to sit in the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court granted certiorari in Nielsen v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am by Steve Vladeck
Olson—the 1988 Supreme Court case in which an 7-1 majority upheld the constitutionality of the now-defunct independent counsel statute. [read post]