Search for: "One (1) Machine" Results 121 - 140 of 8,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2017, 4:21 am by Joshua Horn
First, a significant number of fines in the $1 million plus range. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:29 am by Ed Felten
This required a lot of computation: 6500 machine-years on standard computers (CPUs), plus 100 machine-years on slightly specialized computers (GPUs). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm by Michael Froomkin
The phone call was picked up by my answering machine about 1:30pm. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:00 am by Brett Holubeck
“Single establishment employers” (they have one business and operate in one location) file a single Type 1 report for their company. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 11:22 pm
Readers might remember that this blog has already reported on a couple of fashion law courses, organised and run by former GuestKat Rosie Burbidge, Giulia Gasparin, and myself.We are now organising a new event - 'Fashion Law London - The Spring/Summer Collection' -, which will be held in central London on Friday, 28 February 2020.The 1-day course will focus on key developments in different areas of fashion law, including:Tech and fashionCounterfeitingProtection of… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:26 pm by William Theaker
The book can be ordered for worldwide delivery from O'Reilly & Associates via the Web (http://www.ora.com/catalog/crackdes), or phone (1 800 998 9938, or +1 707 829 0515.) [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
[1] Section 15 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) allows patents to be granted only to eligible “persons”. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
[1] Section 15 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) allows patents to be granted only to eligible “persons”. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:52 am by admin
Mr Norton said: "One of ADA's employees suffered devastating injuries and is still unable to return to work, more than two years after he was trapped in the machine. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
In legal terms, this meant that the invention was not patentable since it was incapable of industrial application under sections 1(1) and 4(1) of the Patents Act 1977. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:27 am by Matt Brown
Quite the well-oiled machine they've got there. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Rajiv Kr. Choudhry
  Lantana appealed to the UK High Court on the ground that the UKIPO officer had erred in considering the invention as not patentable.Claim 1 from Lantana’s (UK application) is reproduced below:Claim 1 (key parts highlighted):An electronic data retrieval system comprising a local station, a remote station, a packet switched network to provide a transmission path between the local station and the remote station, and a machine-readable data storage device storing… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
With the Supreme Court's decision in Chun that the machine is scientifically reliable, one of the better ways to challenge the machine now is how it has operated over a period of time. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
While these patent applications may have initially gone unnoticed, the applications have attracted vast attention for primarily one reason—they name DABUS, an AI machine, as an inventor. [read post]