Search for: "Otte v. Otte" Results 121 - 140 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Anunay Kulshrestha, Gurshabad Grover
While Indian courts have been satisfied with executive sanction and review in the past, there is a strong case to be made that judicial review of surveillance is a “constitutional imperative” after the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Puttaswamy v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Further, ITLA's contention that the "Ott interpretation of Section 2 is unconstitutional," ITLA's Brief at 6, 8, is beyond the scope of our review. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am by David Oxenford
Moreover, the California decision may be an outlier (or it could be overturned on appeal), as the DC decision is far more consistent with cases like WPIX v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright)   Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango)   China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon)   Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP)… [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
  A: Edison’s Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, aka Fred Ott’s Sneeze, in 1894  ____ Q: Name the Joan Crawford movie at issue in the 1940 Supreme Court case Sheldon v. [read post]