Search for: "Oxley, in Re" Results 121 - 140 of 477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2015, 3:53 am by SHG
Sure, they’re the winners, after their lives were subject to massive upheaval. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re weighs in on last week’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:25 am by Broc Romanek
Also, even though the proposed rules are focused on hedging activity, I believe that companies should re-visit their pledging policies because they raise similar issues. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
  We’re here to offer you one of our own – our most-read posts in 2014 about executive disputes. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 11:16 am by Nate Nead
Sarbanes-Oxley has forced an additional layer and cost that many firms simply don’t wish to incur. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Unknown
While I was starting a week long trial in the Southern District of Texas, the 5th Circuit was taking a wide, pro-employee view of Sarbanes Oxley. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Michael Fox
While I was starting a week long trial in the Southern District of Texas, the 5th Circuit was taking a wide, pro-employee view of Sarbanes Oxley. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  Justice Stephen Breyer noted that applying this to undersized grouper fish would allow us to prosecute a hiker who picked a flower, knowing you’re supposed to let wildflowers blossom. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
* “Perhaps Congress should have called this the Sarbanes-Oxley Grouper Act. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by Amy Howe
  At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re lists the “top ten” moments from yesterday’s oral argument, while at ISCOTUSnow Edward Lee predicts the winners in both of yesterday’s cases based on the number of questions at oral argument. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm by Amy Howe
  He warned ominously that, “if that’s going to be the Department of Justice’s position, we’re going to have to be very careful about interpreting the scope” of laws like these. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am by David Markus
Most fonts used for texts today—including the one you’re reading—are “proportional,” meaning the spacing of each letter varies according to its size. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:22 pm by Christopher Hale
  “The Criminal Division intends to prosecute those individuals, whether they’re sitting on a sales desk or in a corporate suite. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:22 am by Guest Blogger
Finance lawyers churn out position papers dismantling the logic of Dodd-Frank, Basel, Sarbanes-Oxley, etc. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Robert B. Lamm
  Since 2002, we’ve seen Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank, higher and sometimes passing votes on a wide variety of shareholder proposals, and rapid growth in corporate efforts to speak with investors. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:21 am by Jack Sharman
  We may be faced with an evolving re-definition of that law school chestnut: Who is the client? [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the Court’s decision comes from: Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, who contends that “[t]he whole sordid tale can tell us something important about how the court does its business today when interpreting statutes”; Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who applauds the decision on the ground that “[p]rosecutorial overreach happens every day” and contends that “it is to the Court’s credit that six of its justices contented themselves with… [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
If you’re looking to squander serious cash at long odds, you’ve come to the right place. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:53 am by Daniel Schwartz
  No, today, we’re talking about Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Whistleblower Protection. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court season is in full swing and we’re seeing a lot of posts on oral arguments and rulling come across the wire on the LexBlog Network. [read post]