Search for: "PAUL C. SPEAKER" Results 121 - 140 of 382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 2:29 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Thus, to be entitled to the protection of qualified privilege, the speaker needs to be clear that the rumor is based on hearsay and not the speaker’s personal knowledge. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:16 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Join me on Saturday, October 20, from 10:30 to 12:00 in Castle B-C, for "Legal Update 2018: Top 10 Legal Developments in Bioethics. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:08 am by Eugene Volokh
"A very interesting post by Peter J Reilly (Forbes), quoted also by Dean Paul Caron (TaxProf Blog); I'm not an expert on this area of the law, but Dean Caron is. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 8:29 am by Victoria Kwan
” Video of the chief justice’s talk is available on C-SPAN. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Beyer, Reactions to Discretionary Trusts: An Update by Richard C. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
It is far from clear that this fact should deprive it of the status of a speaker seeking to protect its own First Amendment rights. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Prac., Lawyer and Judicial Ethics § 5:2(c)(4) (June 2018 Update). 9. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
“I don’t think it matters to public employers as much as it matters to dissenting employees who do not want to pay union fees—even when they are concededly getting collective bargaining and grievance processing services from the union under current exclusive representation rules,” said Paul Secunda, a professor of law at Marquette University and director of its Labor and Employment Law Program. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Quinta Jurecic
“L’etat, c’est moi,” wrote many in response. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Ilya Somin
If it does not, lame-duck House Speaker Paul Ryan might apply the so-called "Hastert Rule," under which legislation cannot come to a vote unless it has the backing of a majority of the majority party - not just a majority of the House as a whole. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Free speech concerns: one speaker pointed that out and said that this was about free speech being embodied—political or artistic expression against body shame. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The First Amendment rules have to be the same for rich speakers (or speakers well-off enough to have insurance) as for poor speakers. [read post]