Search for: "PEARCE v. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 2:14 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011) Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011) Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011) Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011) Bayat Telephone… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief on behalf of AZ State Senator Russell Pearce supporting Arizona’s “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” legislation crafted by State Senator Pearce to penalize Arizona businesses that knowingly hire illegal aliens. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:18 am by Isabel McArdle
(1)A Chief Constable, (2) AA v (1)YK, (2)RB, (3)ZS, (4)SI, (5)AK, (6)MH, [2010] EWHC 2438 (Fam) – Read judgment The High Court has given guidance on the role which special advocates may play in forced marriage and honour violence cases. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:51 am
Employment-at-will status may be tempered by provisions in the employer’s policy manual or personnel handbook under certain conditionsPearce v Clinton Community College, 246 A.D.2d 775New York State is an “employment-at-will” state. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm by Greg Robinson
In July 2010 Arizona state senator Russell Pearce proposed a new state statute to strip citizenship from the children of illegal aliens. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:16 pm by immigrationprof
Even though the Supreme Court held in 1982 that a state cannot discriminate against undocument children in public school education (Plyler v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:36 pm by Green Building Law Brief
In April, Maryland became the first state in the nation to enact legislation permitting the creation of Benefit Corporations. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:01 pm by James Eckert
Matter of Campbell v Pearce also held that once a defendant has started his sentence the court cannot vacate the plea because jeopardy had attached.Properly understood, I think this Court of Appeals decision that "County Court lacks the power to vacate the conviction or plea" removes the threat of state time from people who successfully challenge illegally severe local court sentences, and prevents vacating a plea induced by an illegally severe sentence, if… [read post]