Search for: "POTTER v DISTRICT COURT" Results 121 - 140 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm by lawmrh
And as to underscore the obviousness of the challenges judges face comes a recent case where a Minnesota Appellate Court said that, “In determining the reasonableness and documentation of fees for guardians and conservators, we note that the district court’s task is difficult.” [2] What is “just and reasonable”? [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:33 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
”  Accordingly, the court vacated the district court’s entry of judgment on the added retaliation claim and ordered the district court to dismiss the claim without prejudice. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
Potter Federal Magistrates Act Voir Dire Jurisdiction: Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Sitting without a jury, NSW District Court Judge Judith Gibson heard the matter in February last year. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:32 am
App'x at 857 (affirming district court's finding of no adverse action when plaintiff presented no evidence that negative evaluations impacted plaintiff's compensation); Weston v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:00 am by Steven Boranian
  By the way, the California Supreme Court and the District of the California Court of Appeal that decided Conte share a courthouse just one and a half miles from our storefront fortune teller. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Rory Little
  Finally on this question, the Court decided in 2004 in Schriro v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:21 pm by Will Aitchison
Potter, 202 Fed.Appx. 118 (7th Cir.2006), the court stated: “a mere change in shift schedule which does not materially affect the terms of employment cannot constitute an adverse employment action. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
In a vigorous dissent, Judge O’Brien contended that she failed to establish that similar push-back by male employees had come close to her “critical, obnoxious, insulting, and accusatory behavior” (Potter v Synerlink Corp, April 21, 2014, Matheson, S). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Douglas County School District. [read post]