Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 121 - 140 of 4,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
., the precise number of members on each of the “Regional Fishery Management Councils”). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
We'll just say your current policy isn't a workable standard. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, it is precisely the temptation that the Framers thought they had avoided by rejecting standards like maladministration. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Tobias Lutzi
Although the decision of the Bundesgerichtshof is undoubtedly well reasoned, it reaches the opposite conclusion to recent English case law: in particular, the English Court of Appeal has (even before Brexit) taken the contrary view that the use of a foreign contractual language or a standard form contract tailored to international transactions would even on a standalone basis be sufficient to constitute a relevant international element – and accordingly allow the parties to… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I hope you can join us for the webinar. 1. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
The term “family” does not have a precise legal definition. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]