Search for: "PRODUCERS' SUPPLY CO. v. RENDER" Results 121 - 140 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
These are consequences that may produce not just business risk and the operation of so-called soft law frameworks, but may also produce legal risk throughout the company production chain. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
By the Court: I OVERVIEW [1]              Inco Limited (“Inco”) appeals from a judgment rendered after a trial of common issues in a class proceeding. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm by Larry Catá Backer
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version).We have been unpacking what might at first appear to be a rather straightforward inquiry: "what is law?" [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
                Water Supply County of Siskiyou v. [read post]
The offtake cancellations followed the New York State Public Service Commission’s October 2023 rejection of developers’ petitions for financial relief, unsuccessfully seeking to revise the projects’ Offshore Wind Renewable Energy Certificate (“OREC”) (i.e., a tradable commodity representing the environmental benefits of producing offshore wind energy) Purchase and Sale Agreements (“PSAs”) to reflect current commercial conditions and increased costs… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
 A third case to watch out for is Novartis's Aclasta (zoledronic acid) patent with Swiss-type claims for the use of zoledronic acid in a once-yearly i/v administration for the treatment of osteoporosis. [read post]
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
:  09-076/09-090/09-091   Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]