Search for: "Pace v. Mays"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 12:05 pm
Desiderio In Stonehill Capital Management v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
” Though there ultimately may be an injury, the challenge is not proper at this juncture. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:47 am
Its practice of drawing inspiration from real life may become too risky. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
This week's PatLit PCC Page deals with prospects of a patent litigant getting security for costs against a foe who may not have much cash in hand. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 2:31 pm
’ ” (Roberts v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:45 pm
" The opinion in State of Washington v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 11:46 am
This is a slower pace than usual for the Court, despite the smaller docket, but on par with what we saw last term. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Sections 2-3 of PACE 1984, PACE Code of Practice A, police standard operating procedures and the voluntary ‘Best Use of Stop and Search Scheme’ were also considered to be relevant safeguards. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:19 am
In a kinder, gentler world, the words "you're under arrest" without any accompanying cuffs or restraints may mean you're free to head off with impunity at a measured pace to the nearest coffee shop, or tree top, but in Oregon the words "you're under arrest" means YOU'RE UNDER ARREST AND IN CUSTODY so stop calculating that escape route and forget about that Freedom Road Quickstep maneuver.From the OJD Court of Appeal July 8, 2009, Media… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:49 am
Copyright OfficeLenz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
Even today, though, “hacker” may be good. [read post]
PA Appeals Court Find Competing Hotel Owner Did Not Have Standing to Challenge Zoning Board Decision
16 May 2023, 5:43 pm
South Bethlehem Associates, LP v Zoning Hearing Board of Bethlehem Township, 2023 WL 3471359 (PA 5/16/2023) [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 pm
M-M-M-Mildred Loving (Loving v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:39 pm
June 2017 Pavan v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:54 pm
Court of Appeal, in R.E.Q. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:05 pm
By Eric Goldman FPX, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 pm
In 0690860 Manitoba v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Garcia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
Hargreaves v Powys County Council Trading Standards Department [2015] EWHC 1803 (Admin) confirms that neither the powers of the criminal courts under section 78 of PACE nor the powers of the court under section 59 are a suitable alternative remedy. [read post]
