Search for: "Painter v. Painter"
Results 121 - 140
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2010, 5:46 am
” [Perlis/Chais, Forbes] Sept. 28 in House: “Congressional Hearing on the Problems of Overcriminalization” [NACDL] Abusive-litigation angle seen in NYC mosque controversy [Painter, Legal Ethics Forum] Snark alert: Mr. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 3:05 am
Top Court Rules Litigation Finance Transaction Violates Champerty Doctrine” [Kevin LaCroix, Alison Frankel on Justinian Capital SPC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:03 pm
In today’s case (Larsen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
Existence of conflicting evidence in an administrative proceeding requires conducting a hearing “to fully develop the record”Matter of Carr v Cairo Fire Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 00056, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJames A. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 7:40 am
Painter, 185 F.3d at 571. . . . [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:47 pm
v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:01 am
The Eighth Circuit in AMCO Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Sanford V. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 7:20 am
Aitchison worked as a seasonal painter of high-rise buildings, and used marijuana to help cope with this chronic neck and back pain, but never raised the issue of accommodation with his employer. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:14 pm
(And, if anyone starts thinking about the analysis of reputation and alumni networks that might be associated with Sweatt v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm
Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am
Rural, 499 U.S. 340 (1991), Case C-5/08, Infopaq (2009), Eastern Book v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:02 pm
In December 2018, a three-judge panel in the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court ruling, Painter v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:11 am
On the other hand, simply using Ctrl-C (copy) or Ctrl-V (paste) to move text from WordPerfect to Word usually captures the formatting pretty well. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am
The NARB panel agreed with the NAD’s finding that both the product’s original name (Painter’s Touch Ultra Cover 2X) and its current name (Painter’s Touch 2X Ultra Cover) conveyed an unsubstantiated performance claim that the product delivers twice the coverage of other spray paint products. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am
The NARB panel agreed with the NAD’s finding that both the product’s original name (Painter’s Touch Ultra Cover 2X) and its current name (Painter’s Touch 2X Ultra Cover) conveyed an unsubstantiated performance claim that the product delivers twice the coverage of other spray paint products. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:11 pm
In Painter, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:15 am
ADAGP requested that the painter’s heirs be joined so that the judgment to be given would be applicable to them too. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:15 am
Trader Joe’s (2015) Painter v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:02 pm
Clarke PART V: NEW THEORY 22. [read post]
