Search for: "Parcell v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2016, 9:40 pm
Following a reclassification by the Town of the permitted use of nine contiguous parcels from residential-agricultural use to industrial use, petitioners commenced a proceeding seeking to annul the local law based on, among other things, allegations that the procedures used to adopt the ordinance violated the State Environmental Quality Review Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Gatti v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court will hear arguments tomorrow in the case Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 8:40 am
Eureka Building, Inc v City of Troy, 2020 WL 6887373 (ED MI 11/24/2020) [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:18 am
(EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:49 am
MCL 125/3603(2) states that the “concurring vote of a majority of the members of the zoning board of appeals is necessary . . . . [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
Staker v Town of Springdale, 2020 WL 7779019 (UT App. 12/31/2020) [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:03 am
The statement of facts for the third party’s cargo stated that the bill of lading quantity was 6,014.906 MT. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:12 am
Cayuga Nation v Turner, 2021 WL 3160077 (2nd Cir. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 10:32 am
United Parcel Service. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:56 pm
The case involved renovation and expansion of a 152-acre parcel near Lake Merced, partly surrounded by San Francisco State University. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 2:18 pm
Chmielewski v City of St. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 4:35 pm
In Lions Club of Albany, California v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm
Update: You can read here about Koontz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
The complaint (full text) in Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:35 am
The parcel being zoned "Rural Residential," prior owner had obtained a special exception for this same purpose but had never developed the land.In 2012, LLC neglected its State Department of Assessments and Taxation ("SDAT") obligations and forfeited its right to use its name and do business in Maryland. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:51 am
The Massachusetts Land Court recently decided a real estate dispute involving the validity of a lot size restriction on a parcel of land in Nair v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 12:16 pm
Mullane v. [read post]