Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
United States, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:51 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:01 am
United States, No. 11-1353 (cert. petition filed May 8, 2012). [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:39 pm
Cook v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:40 pm
The Murr family are the plaintiffs in Murr v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:13 pm
Thanks to Judge Dow’s United Parcel Service decision, those days are about over. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:19 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
Diablo v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:54 pm
In the recent appellate case of United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:57 pm
Parcels 3C (formerly part of a larger unit called Parcel 3) and 4A are the former sites of the residential properties condemned in the Kelo litigation. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:01 am
In a recent case, Eastern States Real Estate Management, LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:28 am
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935)). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:07 pm
At issue in Young v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
The United States Supreme Court decided yesterday a malicious prosecution/RICO case with a Fourth and Fifth Amendment implication yesterday: Wilkie v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:10 am
Were we able to predict the future, we would be betting on further proceedings after the decision in CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P. v Cuomo; 2012 NY Slip Op 50073(U) ; Decided on January 19, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County; Singh, J. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
United States, No. 2008-5084 (June 16, 2009), the property owner claimed a designation of its property (Site 28) by the U.S. [read post]