Search for: "Park Restaurant Holdings" Results 121 - 140 of 741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2020, 9:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Following that lead, the Second Circuit (Livingston, Menashi and Park) hold the Governor to "strict scrutiny," which is a legal phrase that means the government cannot get away with certain restrictions without a compelling reason, and the challenged rule or order must be narrowly-tailored to satisfy that compelling interest. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 1:35 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
 After the plaintiff’s friends left the bar intoxicated, they began breaking glass bottles in the parking lot. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:59 am by Neal S. Gainsberg
Locations that are particularly susceptible to negligent security claims include: Apartment buildings and condo units Hotels and motels Amusement parks Retail stores Parking lots Gas stations Bars and restaurants Colleges or universities, especially those with dorms When a criminal attack occurs, the property owner can be held liable for injuries alongside the attacker. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:46 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
Campclar Corporation is the owner and operator of the Spitfire Grill, a restaurant located across the street from a soccer field at the Santa Monica Airport Park. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence Taylor
I continue to receive queries concerning a news article I commented on a long ago, "Parking Under the Influence". [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 5:36 am
The patrons of a bar or restaurant may also be exposed to the risk of injury while outside of an establishment. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:22 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Bank, 700 So. 2d 38, 40 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing the appointment of a receiver because the mortgagor requested release of sequestered rents by the court in a timely manner to make necessary repairs to the parking lot and paint, but the mortgagor refused to authorize use of the sequestered funds). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:22 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Bank, 700 So. 2d 38, 40 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing the appointment of a receiver because the mortgagor requested release of sequestered rents by the court in a timely manner to make necessary repairs to the parking lot and paint, but the mortgagor refused to authorize use of the sequestered funds). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:22 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Bank, 700 So. 2d 38, 40 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing the appointment of a receiver because the mortgagor requested release of sequestered rents by the court in a timely manner to make necessary repairs to the parking lot and paint, but the mortgagor refused to authorize use of the sequestered funds). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 10:37 pm by Michael Ehline
[Page Updated 06/16/2022] Victims can hold the owner of a store liable for any injuries they incur due to the negligence of the store’s owner. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
” The bylaw was challenged by a unit owner whose tenant operated a popular restaurant requiring much more parking than was allocated. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
” The bylaw was challenged by a unit owner whose tenant operated a popular restaurant requiring much more parking than was allocated. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
” The bylaw was challenged by a unit owner whose tenant operated a popular restaurant requiring much more parking than was allocated. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Zoning Board of Appeals found that plaintiff’s plans to develop a restaurant and a hotel within a previously-established business park were consistent with the GEIS and Finding Statement. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:53 am by Neumann Law Group
For example, this case revolves around a slip and fall in a gas station parking lot. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
Otis and McGrew agreed to meet mid-afternoon in the parking lot of a Chevy’s restaurant. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 5:09 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
To hold otherwise would be an onerous burden on not only [defendant] but every property owner. [read post]