Search for: "Parks v. Planning & Zoning Commission" Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2014, 8:26 am by Patricia Salkin
The Prince George’s County Planning Board of the Maryland–National Capital Park and Planning Commission (“Planning Board”) approved the Comprehensive Design Plan (“CDP”) and Specific Design Plan (“SDP”) of appellee, Zimmer Development Company (“Zimmer”), to construct a retail center. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Newhall Ranch Specific Plan (the specific plan) On May 27, 2003, the County of Los Angeles approved the Newhall Ranch “specific plan” that includes a broad range of residential, mixed-use and non-residential land uses within five villages, allowing for up to 21,308 dwelling units (including 423 second units), 629 acres of mixed-use development, 67 acres of commercial uses, 249 acres of business park land uses, 37 acres of visitor-serving uses, 1,014… [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Act was adopted to protect the 100,000 acre area and created the Commission as a regional planning agency, and directed the creation of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (“Comprehensive Plan”) to guide development. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Lastly, non hearsay allegations must establish, if true, every element of the offense charged and the defendant's commission thereof as ruled in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Board of Trustees.)CEQA TIMING Neighbors for Fair Planning v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
The defendant was charged with eleven counts of having multiple unregistered, unlicensed motor vehicles on his property in the Town of Hyde Park without a site plan approval to operate a junkyard in violation of Hyde Park Code. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Under New York law, the no-action clause of a trust indenture barred noteholders' suit alleging that the corporation's issuance of a dividend and planned spin off a business were fraudulent transfers. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits (sec. 132(f))28. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by admin
In the 1968 zoning document, the City Planning Commission granted the zoning application because “the city gains what amounts to a permanent open park…it is principally because of this public benefit that the Commission has viewed this application with favor. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The court of appeals ruled that the condemnation could proceed based only upon the zoning of the condemnor’s property. [read post]