Search for: "Part 60 Put-Back Litigation"
Results 121 - 140
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:22 am
I’m basically trying to give back. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
Gerald Chan is a leading litigator in Canada, practicing in regulatory, criminal, and administrative law. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
For example, in Germany, there is a single model plaintiff and it is possible to put up joint multiple coalitions. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:25 pm
There are questions about stepping back from professional responsibilities to put the baby first. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:11 pm
The success of a litigation campaign like the one pushed by LBS Innovations shows why we can’t rely on the parts of the Patent Act that cover prior art to weed out bad patents. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
Also: Enviga claims to burn 60-100 calories from drinking the beverage; Miller’s caffeinated alcohol beverage, Sparks (now no longer contains caffeine). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:10 am
Scott Riddle’s practice focuses on bankruptcy and litigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
A partial retraction, on the other hand, would mean that only certain items would be handed back. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
After the third suspension, Nebraska Beef took USDA to court, arguing that another shutdown would put the company out of business. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:35 pm
All of this transparency led to legal process management, demanded by clients as part of bid for national litigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
This was a wise decision, for indeed, the Board’s conclusion was clearly open to it on the evidentiary record. [60] Access argued extensively in its memorandum (not at the hearing or in its outline of oral argument) that the Board was wrong to discard the Guidelines as they were the best evidence of the behaviour to be assessed to determine the issue of fairness. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
This was a wise decision, for indeed, the Board’s conclusion was clearly open to it on the evidentiary record. [60] Access argued extensively in its memorandum (not at the hearing or in its outline of oral argument) that the Board was wrong to discard the Guidelines as they were the best evidence of the behaviour to be assessed to determine the issue of fairness. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Just waiting until 60 to remarry puts you in a different place as this slideshow illustrates. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:58 am
Now, the part I want to focus on in this section is item #5, from which I'll quote now: "Only the 'methodology and the assessment,' however, and not the FRAND determination itself, would be made public absent consent of the parties, see article 60), though it's not clear to me what the difference is between the 'assessment' and the 'FRAND determination.'" This is another terminology issue with the draft regulation. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 6:00 pm
Since 1999, the firm has also made charity and giving back to the communities it serves a major part of who we are and what we do. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
First, I must say that there is no such thing as "pure money" litigation (see my paper on this topic here starting on page 60). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:00 am
Since 1999, the firm has also made charity and giving back to the communities it serves a major part of who we are and what we do. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 1:20 pm
Since 1999, the firm has also made charity and giving back to the communities it serves a major part of who we are and what we do. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:55 pm
” This all goes in part to explain, I suppose, why I am so adamant in my support of the producers of Expelled, despite my contempt for their message and my respect, admiration, and love for their adversaries in their copyright litigation. [read post]
