Search for: "Peek v. Peek"
Results 121 - 140
of 438
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm
If the Patent Office had taken a peek at the real world, and applied a modicum of common-sense, it would have quickly rejected IBM’s claims. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 12:46 pm
Reprinted from The Government Contractor, with permission of Thomson Reuters. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 7:48 pm
Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:40 pm
Via Bloomberg – “Microsoft Corp. persuaded a judge not to let the U.S. government out of a lawsuit alleging the company’s free-speech rights are violated by a law that blocks it from alerting users to the clandestine interception of their e-mails. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:08 am
Dep’t of Corrs. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:08 am
Dep’t of Corrs. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 4:15 pm
Bonus question for the day:The shortened caption for this opinion is "Japanese Village v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:07 am
Peek v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
State, 284 Ga. 165, 174-175(3)(d), 664 S.E.2d 227 (Georgia Supreme Court 2008) (no Fourth Amendment violation where officers seized items in plain view during processing of crime scene); Peek v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
State, 284 Ga. 165, 174-175 (3) (d), 664 S.E.2d 227 (Georgia Supreme Court 2008) (no Fourth Amendment violation where officers seized items in plain view during processing of crime scene); Peek v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
State, 284 Ga. 165, 174-175 (3) (d) (664 SE2d 227) (2008) (no Fourth Amendment violation where officers seized items in plain view during processing of crime scene); Peek v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Texas, may today be finding some solace in Mathis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Beacon v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:36 am
Reznik v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:36 am
Reznik v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:40 pm
” Shepherd v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:51 pm
“Peek” is a verb that means a quick glance, like Let me take a peek at the bill before you pay it. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
The driver then peeked over the side gate of the house before returning to the car. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
The Trunki caseThe key cases relevant to these questions were Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA Civ 936, in which it was held that a registered design based on a line drawing was for the shape alone, and Samsung v Apple [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, in which Apple had contended that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the simple line drawing of a tablet which they had registered as the design. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
It’s also worth taking a peek at his dispute with Judge Brett M. [read post]
