Search for: "People in Interest of PD" Results 121 - 140 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Since people in crisis may not behave as expected when issued an officer’s order, nearly a quarter of 'use of force' incidents arise from these calls. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am by Michael Froomkin
Del Ray for failing to disclose her financial interests (Herald coverage at Lawsuit aims to boot erotic hotel-owning judicial candidate off ballot ). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am by Michael Froomkin
Del Ray for failing to disclose her financial interests (Herald coverage at Lawsuit aims to boot erotic hotel-owning judicial candidate off ballot ). [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:18 pm by Jennifer Lynch
The FCC is charged with safeguarding the public's interest in transparency and equality of access to communication over the airwaves. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:08 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Austin PD last week released a massive report by the Matrix consulting group (uploaded here) evaluating the department's staffing in terms of its focus on community policing. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
And Grits was interested to see this sociologist place the research in context of other related findings. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:21 am by SHG
The defendant has a right to counsel regardless of what the PD or the judge does. [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here are a few items which both merit Grits readers' attention and enable me to clear my browser tabs:Dallas PD can't fill cadet classPoor Dallas PD can't catch a break. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
People assume 512 notice and takedown model for complaints unrelated to ©. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 10:37 am by Steve Slick
The author’s second promise was to examine “the long-term relationship between American espionage and the American people in an era of shrinking trust in government and expanding global threats. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
The judges who made the orders genuinely thought the orders were in their best interest, made in good faith and after conscientious application of s1 Children Act 1989 (in which the welfare of children is paramount). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:14 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
The WSJ column employs some interesting rhetoric, starting with its title, which is clearly intended to provoke a visceral response. [read post]